My referrals teach me SEO

While looking through my search referrals (with the glorious Mint), I came across a term that seemed too broad for my site to pull up in any decent position. Usually I get found for pretty specific things such as *Winning by Jack Welch* or the most recent, *desktop backgrounds of love*. (Uh…?)

The term was *color palette 2006*, which according to Google has 7.4 million results, out of which I came up number 9. It was a deep link to my post about BePrivy’s color palette—*2006* was nowhere to be found except for in the URL.

The part that I love about this (besides the tiny boost in traffic from all the color trendwatchers out there) is that whoever actually searched that term and found me, would have at least found commentary about color palettes, with links to additional color palettes over at Firewheel. It may not have been exactly what they were searching for (if I had to guess) but it was at least leading in the right direction.

For all the talk about how advanced Google’s algorithms are, the SERPs are still filled with plenty of disparate results that seem to only be showing because they have some combination of the term you searched for, not neccessarily together in a string (usually not it seems), and a lot of people link to them. (Unless you searched for something really esoteric, in which case you only got 23 results back.)

I wonder if the person who searched for *desktop backgrounds of love* found what they were looking for—I know we all love GTD, but somehow I doubt I’m what they had in mind.